Camera Hardware & Software

Huawei introduced its first dual rear camera setup with the P9 last year. Since then, Huawei has added the feature to several more of its phones, including the Honor 8 and Honor 6X. It’s no surprise then to see Huawei’s flagship Mate 9 sporting dual cameras around back.

Like the P9, the Mate 9’s rear cameras were co-developed with Leica, the well-known German camera manufacturer. The two companies worked together, tweaking lens design and Huawei’s image processing algorithms, to ensure the captured images met Leica’s requirements. The Mate 9’s Camera app also received some input from Leica. While it offers the same features as the camera included with EMUI 4.1 on the Honor 8, it adds three film modes—Standard, Vivid, Smooth—that produce the same effects as those included in Leica’s cameras. The app also uses Leica’s fonts and colors for the UI and even replicates the Leica shutter sound.

The Mate 9’s camera module uses two different sensors. For the color sensor, Huawei uses a 12MP IMX286 Exmor RS, which belongs to Sony’s stacked BSI family. This is the same color sensor used in the P9 and Honor 8. The 20MP monochrome sensor is also made by Sony but was customized for Huawei. We do not know the exact model, but based on my calculations it most likely is one of Sony’s latest sensors with 1.0µm pixels. This black-and-white-only sensor captures significantly more light than the color sensor, because it does not have an RGB Bayer color filter array keeping light from reaching the photodiodes.

By combining the luminance data from the monochrome sensor with the color data from the other sensor, the Mate 9 produces a single image that should have better contrast and less noise than an image taken with only a single color sensor. Using two smaller sensors instead of a single large sensor to capture more light also keeps the phone thinner and avoids a big camera bump; a larger sensor requires a longer focal length, adding to the z-height of the camera module.

Camera Architecture
  Huawei Mate 9 Huawei Mate 8
Front Camera: Resolution 8MP 8MP
Front Camera: Sensor Sony IMX179 Exmor R
(1.4µm, 1/3.2")
Sony IMX179 Exmor R
(1.4µm, 1/3.2")
Front Camera: Focal Length 3.38mm (26mm equivalent) 3.38mm (26mm equivalent)
Front Camera: Aperture f/1.9 f/2.4
Rear Camera: Resolution C: 12MP
M: 20MP
16MP
Rear Camera: Sensor Color:
Sony IMX286 Exmor RS
(1.25µm, 1/2.9")

Monochrome:
Sony ?
Sony IMX298 Exmor RS
(1.12µm, 1/2.8")
Rear Camera: Focal Length C: 3.95mm (27mm equivalent)
M: 3.95mm
4.04mm (27mm equivalent)
Rear Camera: Aperture C: f/2.2
M: f/2.2
f/2.0

Unlike Huawei’s first-generation dual camera in the P9, which used two sensors of the same size to achieve a one-to-one mapping between pixels, the Mate 9’s second-generation dual camera uses different resolution sensors. This implies it must scale the output from one sensor to align with the pixels of the other. To see if this extra scaling impacts image quality, I compared a series of pictures at both 12MP and 20MP. The 20MP images look sharper, like a higher-resolution image should, but otherwise I could not see any significant differences in quality. The Mate 9 still does not appear to use data from the monochrome camera to improve image quality when shooting video, but it does use it when taking HDR photos.

The improved dual-core 14-bit image signal processor (ISP) inside the Mate 9’s Kirin 960 SoC is responsible for merging data from the two sensors. The biggest change here is the integration of a second ISP dedicated to calculating distance and creating depth maps. With Kirin 950/955, this ISP, which was developed with an undisclosed industry partner, was a separate component. Bringing it inside the SoC and onto its 16nm FinFET process should reduce power consumption.

The Mate 9 uses depth sensing for longer-range focusing, part of a hybrid autofocus system that also includes PDAF (fast, works well in good lighting), laser AF (good in low-light conditions at ranges up to 2 meters or 6.5 feet), and traditional contrast AF. Huawei says all four AF methods are used in parallel in order to achieve the fastest AF performance for any condition. Only the color sensor includes PDAF, so when taking black-and-white pictures, only the depth, laser, and contrast AF methods are available. Still, this system is an upgrade over the P9 and Honor 8, whose hybrid AF system did not include PDAF at all. The Mate 9 also includes optical image stabilization (OIS), a feature Huawei’s first-generation dual camera module lacked.

The Mate 9 also uses the depth data captured from its dual cameras for its simulated wide aperture feature. This allows you to change depth of field and the subject in focus either before or even after taking a picture, useful for creating a bokeh effect. The video above shows how this works using the Honor 8 (the Mate 9 works the same way). The focus point (or point of emphasis) is selected by tapping on the desired object in the image. Sliding a finger up or down on the screen adjusts the simulated aperture between f/0.95 to f/16, which determines how much of the image appears out of focus. After applying and saving the changes, the original image and depth map are retained for making additional changes in the future.

This feature works pretty well, but it works best when the subjects of the image are within 2 meters (6.5 feet) of the camera. There are some limitations, however. This feature cannot fix a blurry, unfocused image—you need to take a good picture to start with—and it cannot be used for focus stacking. Also, it’s better at blurring backgrounds than foregrounds, especially for objects farther from the camera.

Display Camera Still Image Quality
Comments Locked

84 Comments

View All Comments

  • Matt Humrick - Friday, January 27, 2017 - link

    I was planning on including a deeper look at Kirin 960, but time spent on other projects forced this review to run late. Hopefully, I'll be able to do a separate article that looks at the A73 and Kirin 960 more in depth, but based on my current workload I cannot make any promises.
  • lilmoe - Friday, January 27, 2017 - link

    Serious question. Should we stop expecting deep dives from anything that isn't Apple? I mean, do deep dives from the Ax chips actually matter since that's all what any iPhone user would ever get?

    Since Android is fairly open, wouldn't it be easier, and take less time, to make several deep dive write ups of various Android device SoCs than a single Apple chip?
  • Meteor2 - Friday, January 27, 2017 - link

    I think Ryan and co have already said as much. Certainly there'll be no in depth description of the 820.
  • Matt Humrick - Friday, January 27, 2017 - link

    Deep analysis of technology, including SoCs, is still the central theme of our coverage, and we will continue to cover products and components from a variety of companies. The issue with this type of coverage is that it requires a lot of time and specialized knowledge, making it very difficult to find people who can contribute. This is why we have not posted as many deep-dive articles recently.
  • lilmoe - Saturday, January 28, 2017 - link

    Thanks for the response. But isn't it a bit contradictory to say that it's the theme of your coverage yet isn't possible due to lack of staff?

    Bear with me. Other than display analysis, what other type of coverage is Anandtech committed to ATM? What makes you different from the plethora of mobile review sites that provide the same benchmarks and subjective personal opinion?

    I've mentioned this before during the GS7 and Note7 reviews. We can get benchmark numbers from other sites WAY earlier than you guys deliver. Hardware and UI designs are subjective. Battery life benches have nothing to do with real life expectations. Camera reviews are biased and unsystematic. So what's left?

    Again, benchmarks aren't straight forward. Many factors come into play. You just saw this first hand with how the Kirin 960 performs, yet scrolling speed (which wasn't present at earlier builds as others have noted) isn't perfect. It was deep dives that drew a clearer picture of how and why devices and SoCs performed the way they did, it's what separated meaningless numbers from educated understandings of what to expect. A trained eye can read the numbers differently from others, even from the author. It's that data that kept us coming back. If that's gone, what's left??

    Please take this to heart. I'm not criticizing for the heck of it.
  • akdj - Tuesday, January 31, 2017 - link

    Maybe you should go somewhere else

    You initiated the conversation by referencing "AX Apple deep dives" - an obvious dig on the site, and you along with a few others' beliefs that Anandtech's coverage is 'Apple heavy' - you're eloquently responded to and yet you still don't 'get it'

    Move along, certainly no reason apparently to be here, much less criticize the author/site's few employees (who do what they do for their love and passion for tech, not the cash, I promise) with a workload you have somehow made up in your mind as critical... all the while being literally clueless as to what he and his fellow colleagues' workload entails

    Ignorance and belittling the employees says much more about your anonymous, demanding self than it does the site's content

    Be gone, already
    AJ
  • melgross - Friday, January 27, 2017 - link

    Still waiting for the "deep dive" promised for last October for the A10 chip.
  • tipoo - Friday, January 27, 2017 - link

    Me too, any status on that?
  • beaner_b - Friday, January 27, 2017 - link

    Any word on their FCC certification status for CDMA?
  • zeeBomb - Friday, January 27, 2017 - link

    Dam...Why today not yesterday? We're seeing a great company on the rise people!

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now