Qualcomm’s New Lawsuit Cites Six Patents, Seeks US Sales Ban of Infringing Apple Productsby Anton Shilov on July 6, 2017 9:00 PM EST
Qualcomm is about to enter another round of its legal battle against Apple. With a new complaint, the company is set to file on Friday with the U.S. ITC. In the complaint, Qualcomm accuses Apple of infringing its patents that cover various technologies that can extend the battery life of a mobile device and seeks to ban sales of Apple’s devices in the U.S with a limited exclusion order for non-Qualcomm baseband Apple devices, and a Cease and Desist Order for all infringing devices.
Back in January, Apple filed a lawsuit against Qualcomm and accused the company of overcharging for its chips and withholding a payment of about $1 billion in promised rebates, which is what Apple wants to get from its partner. Several days before Apple sued Qualcomm, the U.S. ITC charged the latter company with multiple antitrust violations, one of which was preclusion of Apple from sourcing baseband modems from Qualcomm’s rivals. In April, Qualcomm countersued Apple and accused the company of numerous wrongdoings, including interfering Qualcomm’s business relationships with manufacturers of Apple iOS devices as well as of artificially limiting capabilities of Qualcomm’s modem in the iPhone 7. In the new lawsuit to be filed on Friday, Qualcomm is accusing Apple of infringing six of its patents not related to wireless networks and 'is seeking a Cease and Desist Order barring further sales of infringing Apple products that have already been imported and to halt the marketing, advertising, demonstration, warehousing of inventory for distribution and use of those imported products in the United States'.
The patents in question (see table below for details) cover various techniques that can extend the battery life of mobile devices. The patents are not covered by any industry standard, are not essential parts of any devices, and all six patents were issued in the last four years, Qualcomm asserts. At least one of the patents covers an essential aspect of any modern mobile SoC (e.g., a GPU stream processor supporting mixed precision instruction execution) and it could be considered impossible to build one without infringing that particular patent.
Qualcomm claims that Apple’s iOS devices use the aforementioned Qualcomm’s patents all the time, yet the hardware maker does not pay any royalties. What is ironic about the lawsuit is that while it does not involve Qualcomm’s wireless patents, it seeks to stop sales of iPhones and iPads with modems that compete against those from Qualcomm, essentially forcing Apple to buy baseband processors only from Qualcomm.
|Qualcomm's Patents Allegedly Infringed by Apple|
|U.S. Patent No.
(Year of Issue)
|Name||Abstract Description||Qualcomm's Description|
|Programmable streaming processor with mixed precision instruction execution.||Relates to a programmable streaming processor that is capable of executing mixed-precision (e.g., full-precision, half-precision) instructions using different execution units.||Enables high performance and rich visual
graphics for games while increasing a mobile
device’s battery life.
|Low-voltage power-efficient envelope tracker.||Techniques for generating a power supply for an amplifier and/or other circuits.||Extends battery life by building intelligence into
the system so the antenna is always using just
the right amount of battery power to transmit,
whether it be video, text, or voice.
|Compact and robust level shifter layout design.||The field of invention relates to a semiconductor device and methods of manufacturing a semiconductor device handling a plurality of voltage, specifically multi-voltage circuits for shifting the voltage level between voltage domains.||Maximizes smartphone performance while
extending battery life by connecting high
voltage circuits and low voltage circuits with
|Direct scatter loading of executable software image from a primary processor to one or more secondary processor in a multi-processor system.||In a multi-processor system, an executable software image including an image header and a segmented data image is scatter loaded from a first processor to a second processor.||Enables “flashless boot” which allows your
smartphone to connect to the internet quickly
after being powered on, while extending battery
life and reducing memory size.
|Power saving techniques in computing devices.||As the name implies.||Enables the applications on your smartphone to
get their data to and from the internet quickly
and efficiently by acting as a smart “traffic cop”
between the apps processor and the modem.
|Power tracker for multiple transmit signals sent simultaneously.||Techniques for generating a power tracking supply voltage for a circuit (e.g., a power amplifier). The circuit may process multiple transmit signals being sent simultaneously on multiple carriers at different frequencies.||Enables a mobile device to send high-speed data
such as live video from your phone by combining
many lanes of traffic into a data super-highway
while prolonging battery life.
Qualcomm expects the ITC investigation to start in August and for the case go to trial in 2018. In addition to the complaint with the ITC, Qualcomm also filed a lawsuit against Apple in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California alleging of the same wrongdoings.
We have questions fired at Qualcomm and Intel and will update in due course when we get responses.
Official Qualcomm Press Release
SAN DIEGO, July 6, 2017 /PRNewswire/ -- Qualcomm Incorporated (Nasdaq: QCOM) today announced that it is filing a complaint with the United States International Trade Commission (ITC) alleging that Apple has engaged in the unlawful importation and sale of iPhones that infringe one or more claims of six Qualcomm patents covering key technologies that enable important features and functions in iPhones. Qualcomm is requesting that the ITC institute an investigation into Apple's infringing imports and ultimately issue a Limited Exclusion Order (LEO) to bar importation of those iPhones and other products into the United States to stop Apple's unlawful and unfair use of Qualcomm's technology. The Company is seeking the LEO against iPhones that use cellular baseband processors other than those supplied by Qualcomm's affiliates. Additionally, Qualcomm is seeking a Cease and Desist Order barring further sales of infringing Apple products that have already been imported and to halt the marketing, advertising, demonstration, warehousing of inventory for distribution and use of those imported products in the United States.
"Qualcomm's inventions are at the heart of every iPhone and extend well beyond modem technologies or cellular standards," said Don Rosenberg, executive vice president and general counsel of Qualcomm. "The patents we are asserting represent six important technologies, out of a portfolio of thousands, and each is vital to iPhone functions. Apple continues to use Qualcomm's technology while refusing to pay for it. These lawsuits seek to stop Apple's infringement of six of our patented technologies."
The six patents, U.S. Patent No. 8,633,936, U.S. Patent No. 8,698,558, U.S. Patent No. 8,487,658, U.S. Patent No. 8,838,949, U.S. Patent No. 9,535,490, and U.S. Patent No. 9,608,675 enable high performance in a smartphone while extending battery life. Each of the patents does so in a different way for different popular smartphone features; https://www.qualcomm.com/iphone-infographic. While the technologies covered by the patents are central to the performance of the iPhone, the six asserted patents are not essential to practice any standards in a mobile device or subject to a commitment to offer to license such patents.
Qualcomm today also filed a complaint against Apple in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California alleging that Apple infringes the same six patents in the complaint filed in the ITC. The complaint seeks damages and injunctive relief.
Qualcomm expects that the ITC investigation will commence in August and that the case will be tried next year.
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
melgross - Sunday, July 9, 2017 - linkNo, Samsung lost very big everywhere, except for their home country of ‘s Korea, where they won two of the three suits against it.
melgross - Sunday, July 9, 2017 - linkWell, Apple sues Samsung 31 times around the world, and won 28 times. That’s pretty good.
name99 - Friday, July 7, 2017 - link(a) Patents protect reality not imagination. I don't get to say "imagine a CPU that has the performance of an i9 at 1W power" and then sue everyone who actually does the work of inventing this five years from now. So Star Trek is irrelevant to anything.
(b) Design Patents are not the same thing as Patents. Hence the name...
If you don't like the name, complain to the US government.
If you don't like the concept of protecting DESIGN complain to the US government.
Either way, the issue you raise with Round Rects is a DESIGN PATENT issue, not a PATENT issue and is as irrelevant here as complaining about the name overlap between Apple the computer company and Apple the Beatles music company.
cmikeh2 - Friday, July 7, 2017 - linkThe article is somewhat misleading on the dates for these patents. While the patent was issued in 2014, the actual filing date was in 2008.
coburn_c - Friday, July 7, 2017 - linkSo exciting. Whos throat will Apple try to cut next? Foxconn?
Remember that time they tried to take on Google? That was hilarious.
Sadly our bought and sold courts will probably help them slit Qualcomm's windpipe.
osxandwindows - Friday, July 7, 2017 - linkSamsung is also in support of apple/FTC…
SydneyBlue120d - Friday, July 7, 2017 - linkYes, and this has gone a lot under the radar...
id4andrei - Friday, July 7, 2017 - linkSamsung is in support for a different matter. Samsung wants to sell modem integrated Exynos chips.
SydneyBlue120d - Friday, July 7, 2017 - linkThanks for your reply, do You have more info on this?
I always wondered why AFAIK no one, correct me if I'm wrong, uses Samsung modems that seems to be very good, better than Intel for sure.
Aenean144 - Friday, July 7, 2017 - linkIf an OEM wants to sell a phone in the USA that supports CDMA (Verizon, Sprint, their MVNOs), they have to use Qualcomm modems. Qualcomm has a lock on CDMA IP in the USA and sets up licensing economics such that everyone uses QCOM modems or ends up having a more expensive phone with a non QCOM modem.
Thusly, there isn't much point in using a Samsung modem, Intel modem, or whatever modem that can support CDMA in the USA.