The Microsoft Surface Pro 6 Review: More Than A Colorby Brett Howse on October 16, 2018 3:01 AM EST
- Posted in
- Surface Pro
- Surface Pro 6
Microsoft is in a bit of a unique place in the PC space compared to other manufacturers. Other than Apple, Microsoft is the only company that controls both the hardware and software sides, and when the Surface lineup launched way back in 2012, Microsoft’s goal was to showcase the advantages of their platform with a premium hardware lineup. On October 2nd 2018, the company unveiled their sixth iteration of what is now a staple in the PC space, the Surface Pro 6.
On the outside, it would be easy to write this refresh off as a spec bump, but there are tangible improvements throughout the Surface Pro which make this a worthwhile successor to the 2017 Surface Pro. The company hasn’t completely reinvented Surface Pro since the Surface Pro 3 launched in 2014, with the move to the new thin and light form factor, showcasing the 3:2 aspect ratio display. Surface Pro 4 stretched the display from 12-inches to 12.3-inches in the same size device, and moved from Haswell to Skylake, and Surface Pro 2017 made some more small tweaks, and with the move to Kaby Lake finally solved the power management issues that plagued the Skylake generation of Surface devices.
Arguably the biggest change that people will see with the Surface Pro 6 is that it’s available in a new color: black. Surface hasn’t been offered in black since the days of the Surface Pro 2, and the new color will live alongside the existing platinum color we’ve come to know throughout Microsoft’s PC lineup. But, inside the device are new components which help move the Surface Pro to a new level. The most noticeable is that Microsoft has moved to the quad-core Kaby Lake Refresh chips, and as we’ve seen throughout the rest of the PC industry, Kaby Lake Refresh brings a significant performance boost.
|Microsoft Surface Pro 6|
|Model Tested: Core i5-8250U 8GB 256GB $1199|
|Processor||Intel Core i5-8250U
4C/8T, 1.6-3.4GHz, 6MB L3, 14nm, 15w
Intel Core i7-8650U
4C/8T, 1.9-4.2GHz, 8MB L3, 14nm, 15w
|Memory||8 GB or 16 GB Dual-Channel LPDDR3|
|Graphics||Intel Core i5-8250U
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (24 EUs, 300-1100 MHz)
Intel Core i7-8650U
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (24 EUs, 300-1150 MHz)
|Display||12.3" 2736x1824 3:2 PixelSense
LG Display, Touch and Pen support
100% sRGB color + enhanced color, individually calibrated panels
|Storage||128 GB, 256 GB, 512 GB, 1 TB PCIe 3.0 x2|
|Networking||802.11ac, 2x2:2, 866Mpbs Max, 2.4 and 5GHz
|Audio||1.6 W Stereo Speakers (front facing)
Dolby Audio Premium
|Battery||45 Wh, 44 W AC Adapter with USB charging port|
|Right Side||USB 3.0 Type-A
Mini DisplayPort 1.2
MicroSDXC Card Reader
Surface Connect Port (charging and docking)
|Left Side||Headset Jack|
|Dimensions||292 x 201 x 8.5 mm (11.5 x 7.9 x 0.33 inches)|
|Weight||Core i5: 770 grams (1.70 lbs)
Core i5/i7: 784 grams (1.73 lbs)
|Cameras||Rear: 8.0 MP auto-focus
Front: 5.0 MP auto-focus and Windows Hello support
|Extras||Surface Pen and Dial (sold separately)
Surface Dock - 2 x mDP 1.2, 4 x USB 3.0, 1 x Gigabit (sold separately)
|Pricing||128 GB Core i5 8GB RAM: $899
256 GB Intel Core i5 with 8GB of RAM: $1199
256 GB Intel Core i7 with 8GB of RAM: $1499
512 GB Intel Core i7 with 16GB of RAM: $1899
1 TB Intel Core i7 with 16GB of RAM: $2299
One decision that we’ve seen questioned since the launch event was disappointment in the lack of an Iris GPU option in the Surface Pro with this generation. The 2017 model we reviewed was outfitted with the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, which doubles the execution units compared to the standard UHD Graphics 620, as well as adds 64 MB of eDRAM. The Iris option is no more though, but even if Microsoft had wanted to continue offering it, Intel no longer sells any 15-Watt CPUs in their current lineup with the Iris option. You’d have to move up to a 28-Watt model at the moment to be offered access.
The rest of the Surface Pro, on a technical specification sheet, is pretty much identical to the outgoing model. The 12.3-inch display is the same 2736 x 1824 resolution, you can get SSD capacities up to 1 TB, and RAM is offered with up to 16 GB as the maximum due to the limitations of LPDDR3 capacities. Also along for the ride is the same Marvell AVASTAR wireless that has been used exclusively in all Surface devices for too long.
The one missing feature that everyone would have likely expected to see with this launch was a USB-C port, since Microsoft finally includes it in place of the mini DisplayPort in the Surface Book 2, as well as on the Surface Go, but in a confusing move, the Surface team has kept the mini DisplayPort connector on Surface Pro rather than move to USB-C which could also double as DisplayPort when needed.
Microsoft has also cut the prices quite significantly, but the very bottom end model with the Core m3 and lowest price is no more. The good news is that the base configuration drops the 4 GB of RAM though, meaning a 128 GB Core i5 with 8 GB of RAM is now the base at $899. Last year the MSRP of the 128 GB Core i5 was $999 and it only came with 4 GB of RAM. At the very top, the savings are even larger, with the 1 TB Core i7 with 16 GB of RAM a full $400 less than the launch price of last year's Surface Pro.
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
Brett Howse - Tuesday, October 16, 2018 - linkCinebench isn't long enough for sustained workload testing, but we run it 8 times and throw out the first number. x264 is a much longer test.
krutou - Tuesday, October 16, 2018 - linkI think the idea is to chart multiple Cinebench runs like they do on notebookcheck.
The first result demonstrates the capability of the chip, at the thermal settings specified by the laptop vendor. Some vendors specify an extremely high max TDP for short turbo.
Subsequent results show how much performance degradation is attributed to good/bad thermals, as well as the vendor specified sustained TDP.
eddman - Tuesday, October 16, 2018 - linkYou can run it back-to-back in a loop. Notebookcheck does 50 runs, although you can do less since the lowest sustained number usually becomes clear by the 10-11th run.
You run it 8 times in a loop or with pauses?
eddman - Saturday, November 10, 2018 - linkJust as I expected. While i7 model's performance drops by ~11%, the i5 drops by ~25%. That's quite significant.
The omission of the fan was a bad move.
darkich - Tuesday, October 16, 2018 - linkI don't understand..what supposed performance bump?
If anything, the performance is a total fiasco judging by those web tests!
damianrobertjones - Tuesday, October 16, 2018 - linkIt look close but anything multi-threaded will adore the new quad Cpu. Single threaded will be down to cache.
i5-7300u - i5-8250u
2.60GHz - 1.60GHz Base Freq
3.5GHz - 3.40GHz Max Turbo
3Mb - 6Mb Smartcache
2 - 4 cores
You might want to view ALL the graphs instead of the ones that you want to prove your point.
damianrobertjones - Tuesday, October 16, 2018 - linkMistake:
" Here the Surface Pro 6 does quite well, especially on the lower detail settings. When the game is set to its maximum settings at 1920x1080, the Iris GPU in last year’s Surface Pro 6 ends up throttling heavily and offering lower performance despite being a quicker GPU on paper."
Should be: "last year's Surface Pro (2017) ends up..."
TheinsanegamerN - Tuesday, October 16, 2018 - linkYawn. No new features, even more anemic GPUs, still meh battery life, throttled performance.
What is the point of a pro device if there is noting pro about it? At least the macbook "pros", for as anemic and poorly designed as they are, have the option of iris plus graphics. They are the only company to use the 28 watt options. MS cant even be bothered to use the 15w iris chips.
damianrobertjones - Tuesday, October 16, 2018 - linkDid you read the review? Did you look at the charts? Does the macbook have a touchscreen? Can you use a stylus on the mac that's of the same quality? Did you notice that the Iris graphics didn't offer that much compared to a quad core cpu? Did you notice that the battery life is class leading? Did you notice that it didn't throttle as much as, for example, the Dell quad tablets?
rrinker - Tuesday, October 16, 2018 - linkFor the intended use, what purpose does more GPU serve other than decrease battery life? My workbench computer is a previous gen I3, and it handles electronic CAD and my 3D model railroad CAD programs just fine - every bit as snappy as my main desktop with a GTX970. There is absolutely no difference with Office type apps. This isn't a gaming device. I built my workbench computer to be as small and low power as possible (without resorting to the ultra low power laptop CPUs), so no discrete GPU, not even Iris, just a plain old I3 and an SSD in a mini-ITX cube. It does the job just fine. So will this Surface. So, in fact, does my laptop, with an I7-660U - it can run the same programs just fine. Games? No, but I did't buy it for that.