After a year of searching for the right place of its new U.S. fab, Samsung this week announced that it would build a fab near Taylor, Texas. The company will invest $17 billion in the new semiconductor fabrication plant and will receive hundreds of millions of dollars in incentives from local and state authorities. Separately, Texas authorities have announced that Texas Instruments intend to spend $30 billion on new fabs in the state, as well.

Samsung to Spend $17 Billion on New Texas Fab

Samsung yet has to disclose all the details about its fab near Taylor, Texas, but for now the company says that the new fab site will occupy an area of over 5 million square meters and will employ 2,000 workers directly and another 7,000 indirectly. To put the number into context, Samsung's fab near Austin, Texas currently employs about 10,000 of workers. 

Samsung will start construction of the new fab in the first half of 2022 and expects it to be operational in the second half of 2024. It usually takes about a year to construct a building for a semiconductor manufacturing facility and then about a year to install and set up all the necessary equipment.

Samsung has not announced which process technologies will be used at its fab near Taylor, Texas, but says it will produce chips for 5G, artificial intelligence (AI), high-performance computing (HPC), and mobile applications, which implies that the fab will gain fairly advanced technologies. In fact, keeping in mind that all of Samsung's nodes thinner than 7 nm rely on extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography, it is reasonable to expect the new fab to be EUV capable. As a result, Samsung's customers from the U.S. (such as IBM, Nvidia, and Qualcomm) will be able to produce their chips in the U.S. rather than in South Korea, which might allow their developers to address systems used by the U.S. government. 

"With greater manufacturing capacity, we will be able to better serve the needs of our customers and contribute to the stability of the global semiconductor supply chain," said Kinam Kim, Vice Chairman and CEO, Samsung Electronics Device Solutions Division. "In addition to our partners in Texas, we are grateful to the Biden Administration for creating an environment that supports companies like Samsung as we work to expand leading-edge semiconductor manufacturing in the U.S. We also thank the administration and Congress for their bipartisan support to swiftly enact federal incentives for domestic chip production and innovation."

Samsung's new semiconductor production plant will be located 25 kilometers away from the company's fab near Austin, Texas, so the facilities will be able to share infrastructure and resources (such as materials and supplies).

Samsung says that it will spend about $6 billion on construction on the building as well as improvements of the local infrastructure. Tools that will be used by the fab will cost another $11 billion. Meanwhile, to build the new plant Samsung will receive hundreds of millions in incentives from the state, the county, and the city, according to media reports. Some of the packages have not been approved yet. 

Texas Instruments to Invest $30 Billion on New U.S. Fabs

Samsung is not the only company to build new fabs in Texas. The Governor of Texas recently announced the Texas Instruments was planning to build several new 300-mm fabs near Sherman. In total, TI intends to build as many as four wafer fabrication facilities in the region over coming decades and the cumulative investments are expected to total $30 billion as fabs will be eventually upgraded.

Texas Instruments itself yet have to formally announce its investments plans, but the announcement by the governor Greg Abbot indicates that the principal decisions have been made and now TI needs to finalize the details. 

Sources: SamsungAustin American-StatesmanTexas.gov

POST A COMMENT

136 Comments

View All Comments

  • coburn_c - Thursday, November 25, 2021 - link

    Ports and chemical refineries Reply
  • mode_13h - Friday, November 26, 2021 - link

    You'd think any rust belt state would be ripe for the opportunity. Yet, the article made a good point about the local supplier ecosystem that already exists in the Austin area. Reply
  • FunBunny2 - Friday, November 26, 2021 - link

    "they also lack fresh water resources"

    you think Texas is different?? have you read up the plight of dry-land farming??
    Reply
  • MamiyaOtaru - Friday, November 26, 2021 - link

    the Ogallala Aquifer is in trouble, yes. That's west Texas. Hundreds of miles from Austin. I don't think you grasp how big Texas is. Austin is in the humid subtropical climate zone. Reply
  • sweetca - Thursday, November 25, 2021 - link

    "They should build in state with a stable power grid, like California"

    Hah, good one! Rolling blackouts are super stable!
    Reply
  • mode_13h - Wednesday, November 24, 2021 - link

    Agreed. I expect this investment likely includes building their own power infrastructure. Probably lots of solar + some diesel generators as fallback/supplemental power.

    One thing that sunny, southern states have in their favor is more sunshine. This gives Texas, Arizona, and Nevada an advantage over more northern states that also have cheap land and low taxes. And as you go farther west, water scarcity is going to be a major long-term concern.

    Rather than direct state subsidies, it'd be nice if the state would put that money towards infrastructure that can benefit not only the new fabs, but other area residents and businesses.
    Reply
  • FunBunny2 - Friday, November 26, 2021 - link

    "southern states have in their favor is more sunshine"

    which means, of course, little local water, which they steal from the Green States. how very Confederate of them!
    Reply
  • MamiyaOtaru - Friday, November 26, 2021 - link

    you're vomiting ignorance all over this thread. Southern states get more precipitation than the states to their north. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-Effective-... The Pacific Northwest is something else again, but the American South has no need to bring in water from anywhere. If you are talking about the SouthWEST yeah that's dry but it was never Confederate. Texas is the only Confederate state that could be remotely considered dry, and that's only in the western half. Reply
  • FunBunny2 - Saturday, November 27, 2021 - link

    "Southern states get more precipitation than the states to their north. "

    consider this:
    "The tropical storms and hurricanes provide a substantial amount of rainfall to areas across the Southeast, and in some regions, they make up close to 40-50% of the rainfall they receive each year!"

    so, you get a soupcon of destruction to boot.
    https://legacy.climate.ncsu.edu/edu/SEPrecip
    Reply
  • gijames1225 - Wednesday, December 8, 2021 - link

    At least you finally just came out and acknowledged you have an antiquated, bigoted view of the Southern states, lol.

    Texas isn't perfect, but I can totally see what given the choice someone would locate a major corporate investment there rather than in California (also the workers will enjoy a far more affordable standard of living which will be good for them as well).
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now