Power Delivery Thermal Analysis

One of the most requested elements of our motherboard reviews revolves around the power delivery and its componentry. Aside from the quality of the components and its capability for overclocking to push out higher clock speeds which in turn improves performance, is the thermal capability of the cooling solutions implemented by manufacturers. While almost always fine for users running processors at default settings, the cooling capability of the VRMs isn't something that users should worry too much about, but for those looking to squeeze out extra performance from the CPU via overclocking, this puts extra pressure on the power delivery and in turn, generates extra heat. This is why more premium models often include heatsinks on its models with better cooling designs, heftier chunks of metal, and in some cases, even with water blocks.


The 21-phase (20+1) power delivery on the ASUS ROG Maximus Z690 Hero

Testing Methodology

Our method of testing is if the power delivery and its heatsink are effective at dissipating heat. We do this by running an intensely heavy CPU workload for a prolonged method of time. We apply an overclock, which is deemed safe and at the maximum that the silicon on our testbed processor allows. We then run the Prime95 with AVX2 enabled under a torture test for an hour at the maximum stable overclock we can, which puts insane pressure on the processor. We collect our data via three different methods which include the following:

  • Taking a thermal image from a birds-eye view after an hour with a Flir Pro thermal imaging camera
  • Securing two probes on to the rear of the PCB, right underneath CPU VCore section of the power delivery for better parity in case a probe reports a faulty reading
  • Taking a reading of the VRM temperature from the sensor reading within the HWInfo monitoring application

The reason for using three different methods is that some sensors can read inaccurate temperatures, which can give very erratic results for users looking to gauge whether an overclock is too much pressure for the power delivery handle. With using a probe on the rear, it can also show the efficiency of the power stages and heatsinks as a wide margin between the probe and sensor temperature can show that the heatsink is dissipating heat and that the design is working, or that the internal sensor is massively wrong. To ensure our probe was accurate before testing, I binned 10 and selected the most accurate (within 1c of the actual temperature) for better parity in our testing.

To recreate a real-world testing scenario, the system is built into a conventional desktop chassis which is widely available. This is to show and alleviate issues when testing on open testbeds, which we have done previously, which allows natural airflow to flow over the power delivery heatsinks. It provides a better comparison for the end-user and allows us to mitigate issues where heatsinks have been designed with airflow in mind and those that have not. The idea of a heatsink is to allow effective dissipation of heat and not act as an insulator, with much more focus from consumers over the last couple of years on power delivery componentry and performance than in previous years.

For thermal imaging, we use a Flir One camera to indicate where the heat is generated around the socket area, as some designs use different configurations, and an evenly spread power delivery with good components will usually generate less heat. Manufacturers who use inefficient heatsinks and cheap out on power delivery components should run hotter than those who have invested. Of course, a $700 flagship motherboard is likely to outperform a cheaper $100 model under the same testing conditions, but it is still worth testing to see which vendors are doing things correctly. 

Thermal Analysis Results


We measured 57.4ºC on the hottest part of the CPU socket during our testing

The ASUS ROG Maximus Z690 has a large 21-phase power delivery, which is controlled by a Renesas RAA229131 20-channel PWM controller that is operating in a 20+1 configuration. The CPU section includes twenty Intersil ISL99390 90 A power stages, while the SoC is using one Intersil 99390 90 A power stage. Keeping the power delivery cool is a large two-section metal heatsink that is interconnected by a single heat pipe. The heatsinks themselves feature multiple fins designed to direct the passive airflow to aid in heat dissipation.

Putting the ASUS ROG Maximus Z690 Hero up against other Z690 boards that we've tested so far, it performs incredibly well in regard to power delivery thermals. The Maximus Z690 Hero has one of the coolest power delivery of any Z690 board we've tested so far, and it is indicative of what we are used to with premium ASUS models. We saw temperatures of 65°C from the integrated VRM sensor which was identical to the GIGABYTE Z690 Aorus Master, as well as temperatures of 67°C and 68°C from our pair of K-type thermocouples.

Overclocking ASUS ROG Maximus Z690 Hero Conclusion
Comments Locked

40 Comments

View All Comments

  • meacupla - Wednesday, June 15, 2022 - link

    People who want thunderbolt ports.
  • NaterGator - Wednesday, June 15, 2022 - link

    "Insert audio caps details." Yes, please. ;)
  • Kevin G - Wednesday, June 15, 2022 - link

    I wish Windows would properly support AVB as that’d enable the I-225 NIC to output audio to say a PoE based speaker.
  • erotomania - Wednesday, June 15, 2022 - link

    My audio caps details could really use some insertion.
  • James5mith - Sunday, June 19, 2022 - link

    Same.
  • DBW49 - Wednesday, June 15, 2022 - link

    You might want to discuss the memory power supply capacitor issues with early versions of this board. Short version: some boards had a surface mount electrolytic capacitor installed with reverse polarity. In some cases, there would be a fire. ASUS recognized the issue and provided repair services for the boards, at the cost of about 2 weeks down time (transportation and repair). That said, I am very pleased with the board.
  • Silver5urfer - Wednesday, June 15, 2022 - link

    I would suggest every single DDR5 owner to skip 4DIMM mobos. They are slower, get 2DIMM ones like APEX or Unify X or Tachyon (I think GB is worst when it's about DRAM speed with Z590).

    Also I hate ASUS on how their QC is absolute trash. I had to order a lot of boards to get the board which didn't have a chip on the mobo edges. All the boards brand new in box, even box condition is super neat had some or other chips on the edges of the boards. And no it's not some basic mobo I'm talking about Maximus line - Hero, Apex class. Even then I had to settle with one which had a small scratch on the Chipset heatsink to the brushed metal finish. Because I do not want to swap this and get another chipped board, some boards had the DIMM slot plastic having a hazy finish too.
  • Tilmitt - Thursday, June 16, 2022 - link

    Will there ever be a CPU or GPU review on this site again?
  • PeachNCream - Thursday, June 16, 2022 - link

    No
  • n0x1ous - Thursday, June 16, 2022 - link

    Its the weirdest thing ever. #1 GPU review site on earth forever, then miss 1 gpu launch then miss them all and haven't had one since. All without any explanation. It's mind boggling @ryansmith

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now