Power Delivery Thermal Analysis

One of the most requested elements of our motherboard reviews revolves around the power delivery and its componentry. Aside from the quality of the components and its capability for overclocking to push out higher clock speeds which in turn improves performance, is the thermal capability of the cooling solutions implemented by manufacturers. While almost always fine for users running processors at default settings, the cooling capability of the VRMs isn't something that users should worry too much about, but for those looking to squeeze out extra performance from the CPU via overclocking, this puts extra pressure on the power delivery and in turn, generates extra heat. This is why more premium models often include heatsinks on its models with better cooling designs, heftier chunks of metal, and in some cases, even with water blocks.


The 21-phase (20+1) power delivery on the ASUS ROG Maximus Z690 Hero

Testing Methodology

Our method of testing is if the power delivery and its heatsink are effective at dissipating heat. We do this by running an intensely heavy CPU workload for a prolonged method of time. We apply an overclock, which is deemed safe and at the maximum that the silicon on our testbed processor allows. We then run the Prime95 with AVX2 enabled under a torture test for an hour at the maximum stable overclock we can, which puts insane pressure on the processor. We collect our data via three different methods which include the following:

  • Taking a thermal image from a birds-eye view after an hour with a Flir Pro thermal imaging camera
  • Securing two probes on to the rear of the PCB, right underneath CPU VCore section of the power delivery for better parity in case a probe reports a faulty reading
  • Taking a reading of the VRM temperature from the sensor reading within the HWInfo monitoring application

The reason for using three different methods is that some sensors can read inaccurate temperatures, which can give very erratic results for users looking to gauge whether an overclock is too much pressure for the power delivery handle. With using a probe on the rear, it can also show the efficiency of the power stages and heatsinks as a wide margin between the probe and sensor temperature can show that the heatsink is dissipating heat and that the design is working, or that the internal sensor is massively wrong. To ensure our probe was accurate before testing, I binned 10 and selected the most accurate (within 1c of the actual temperature) for better parity in our testing.

To recreate a real-world testing scenario, the system is built into a conventional desktop chassis which is widely available. This is to show and alleviate issues when testing on open testbeds, which we have done previously, which allows natural airflow to flow over the power delivery heatsinks. It provides a better comparison for the end-user and allows us to mitigate issues where heatsinks have been designed with airflow in mind and those that have not. The idea of a heatsink is to allow effective dissipation of heat and not act as an insulator, with much more focus from consumers over the last couple of years on power delivery componentry and performance than in previous years.

For thermal imaging, we use a Flir One camera to indicate where the heat is generated around the socket area, as some designs use different configurations, and an evenly spread power delivery with good components will usually generate less heat. Manufacturers who use inefficient heatsinks and cheap out on power delivery components should run hotter than those who have invested. Of course, a $700 flagship motherboard is likely to outperform a cheaper $100 model under the same testing conditions, but it is still worth testing to see which vendors are doing things correctly. 

Thermal Analysis Results


We measured 57.4ºC on the hottest part of the CPU socket during our testing

The ASUS ROG Maximus Z690 has a large 21-phase power delivery, which is controlled by a Renesas RAA229131 20-channel PWM controller that is operating in a 20+1 configuration. The CPU section includes twenty Intersil ISL99390 90 A power stages, while the SoC is using one Intersil 99390 90 A power stage. Keeping the power delivery cool is a large two-section metal heatsink that is interconnected by a single heat pipe. The heatsinks themselves feature multiple fins designed to direct the passive airflow to aid in heat dissipation.

Putting the ASUS ROG Maximus Z690 Hero up against other Z690 boards that we've tested so far, it performs incredibly well in regard to power delivery thermals. The Maximus Z690 Hero has one of the coolest power delivery of any Z690 board we've tested so far, and it is indicative of what we are used to with premium ASUS models. We saw temperatures of 65°C from the integrated VRM sensor which was identical to the GIGABYTE Z690 Aorus Master, as well as temperatures of 67°C and 68°C from our pair of K-type thermocouples.

Overclocking ASUS ROG Maximus Z690 Hero Conclusion
Comments Locked

40 Comments

View All Comments

  • shabby - Thursday, June 16, 2022 - link

    I'll bet there will be an intel gpu review though...
  • erotomania - Thursday, June 16, 2022 - link

    Intel GPU review before an Nvidia 3000 review?

    No Starfighter doesn't count!
  • shabby - Thursday, June 16, 2022 - link

    Sponsored review, you can count on it.
  • PlextorPro - Thursday, June 16, 2022 - link

    Intel GPU.........WHAT???
    You sound like a real enthusiast.....NOT!
  • mode_13h - Thursday, June 23, 2022 - link

    > #1 GPU review site on earth forever

    There have long been sites with comparable or even more comprehensive benchmarks, but the Deep Dives are what really set Anandtech apart.

    I hope someone is going to cover Hot Chips, this year. Can't they at least find some grad student or post doc who's going anyway to just liveblog about it?
  • Byte - Sunday, July 17, 2022 - link

    In all honestly all Nvidia does is enable another core complex and add 5% performance and charge 25% more.
  • bug77 - Thursday, June 16, 2022 - link

    I haven't read the review yet, but when the best you can say about a $600 board is that it's "a solid option", you know the board is a dud.
  • PeachNCream - Thursday, June 16, 2022 - link

    $600 huh? There must be a market for these moron-tier products, but it really would be nice if Anandtech reviewed something relevant to its dwindling community instead of just accepting whatever the OEMs dump onto them out of desperation to drum up hype and sales for fringe products almost none of us are interested in purchasing. Then again, who am I kidding? AT has had this sort of disconnect for quite a few years now.
  • PlextorPro - Thursday, June 16, 2022 - link

    Seriously, thank you for this review and in-depth evaluation!
    With the recent increase in popularity of MINI-ITX (SFF) systems, I would like to see an in-depth! review-comparison of the ASUS ROG Strix Z690-I with other MINI-ITX main boards. I have built a system with this MINI-ITX MB and am very pleased with the performance.

    It has a custom loop for cooling both the i9 12900K and an AMD RX 6800 GPU.
  • PlextorPro - Thursday, June 16, 2022 - link

    Seriously, thank you for this review and in-depth evaluation!
    With the recent increase in popularity of MINI-ITX (SFF) systems, I would like to see an in-depth review-comparison of the ASUS ROG Strix Z690-I with other MINI-ITX main boards. I have built a system with this MINI-ITX MB and am very pleased with the performance.

    It has a custom loop for cooling both the i9 12900K and an AMD RX 6800 GPU.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now