Power Delivery Thermal Analysis

One of the most requested elements of our motherboard reviews revolves around the power delivery and its componentry. Aside from the quality of the components and its capability for overclocking to push out higher clock speeds which in turn improves performance, is the thermal capability of the cooling solutions implemented by manufacturers. While almost always fine for users running processors at default settings, the cooling capability of the VRMs isn't something that users should worry too much about, but for those looking to squeeze out extra performance from the CPU via overclocking, this puts extra pressure on the power delivery and in turn, generates extra heat. This is why more premium models often include heatsinks on its models with better cooling designs, heftier chunks of metal, and in some cases, even with water blocks.


The 21-phase (20+1) power delivery on the ASUS ROG Maximus Z690 Hero

Testing Methodology

Our method of testing is if the power delivery and its heatsink are effective at dissipating heat. We do this by running an intensely heavy CPU workload for a prolonged method of time. We apply an overclock, which is deemed safe and at the maximum that the silicon on our testbed processor allows. We then run the Prime95 with AVX2 enabled under a torture test for an hour at the maximum stable overclock we can, which puts insane pressure on the processor. We collect our data via three different methods which include the following:

  • Taking a thermal image from a birds-eye view after an hour with a Flir Pro thermal imaging camera
  • Securing two probes on to the rear of the PCB, right underneath CPU VCore section of the power delivery for better parity in case a probe reports a faulty reading
  • Taking a reading of the VRM temperature from the sensor reading within the HWInfo monitoring application

The reason for using three different methods is that some sensors can read inaccurate temperatures, which can give very erratic results for users looking to gauge whether an overclock is too much pressure for the power delivery handle. With using a probe on the rear, it can also show the efficiency of the power stages and heatsinks as a wide margin between the probe and sensor temperature can show that the heatsink is dissipating heat and that the design is working, or that the internal sensor is massively wrong. To ensure our probe was accurate before testing, I binned 10 and selected the most accurate (within 1c of the actual temperature) for better parity in our testing.

To recreate a real-world testing scenario, the system is built into a conventional desktop chassis which is widely available. This is to show and alleviate issues when testing on open testbeds, which we have done previously, which allows natural airflow to flow over the power delivery heatsinks. It provides a better comparison for the end-user and allows us to mitigate issues where heatsinks have been designed with airflow in mind and those that have not. The idea of a heatsink is to allow effective dissipation of heat and not act as an insulator, with much more focus from consumers over the last couple of years on power delivery componentry and performance than in previous years.

For thermal imaging, we use a Flir One camera to indicate where the heat is generated around the socket area, as some designs use different configurations, and an evenly spread power delivery with good components will usually generate less heat. Manufacturers who use inefficient heatsinks and cheap out on power delivery components should run hotter than those who have invested. Of course, a $700 flagship motherboard is likely to outperform a cheaper $100 model under the same testing conditions, but it is still worth testing to see which vendors are doing things correctly. 

Thermal Analysis Results


We measured 57.4ºC on the hottest part of the CPU socket during our testing

The ASUS ROG Maximus Z690 has a large 21-phase power delivery, which is controlled by a Renesas RAA229131 20-channel PWM controller that is operating in a 20+1 configuration. The CPU section includes twenty Intersil ISL99390 90 A power stages, while the SoC is using one Intersil 99390 90 A power stage. Keeping the power delivery cool is a large two-section metal heatsink that is interconnected by a single heat pipe. The heatsinks themselves feature multiple fins designed to direct the passive airflow to aid in heat dissipation.

Putting the ASUS ROG Maximus Z690 Hero up against other Z690 boards that we've tested so far, it performs incredibly well in regard to power delivery thermals. The Maximus Z690 Hero has one of the coolest power delivery of any Z690 board we've tested so far, and it is indicative of what we are used to with premium ASUS models. We saw temperatures of 65°C from the integrated VRM sensor which was identical to the GIGABYTE Z690 Aorus Master, as well as temperatures of 67°C and 68°C from our pair of K-type thermocouples.

Overclocking ASUS ROG Maximus Z690 Hero Conclusion
Comments Locked

40 Comments

View All Comments

  • PlextorPro - Thursday, June 16, 2022 - link

    Seriously, thank you for this review and in-depth evaluation!
    With the recent increase in popularity of MINI-ITX (SFF) systems, I would like to see an in-depth! review-comparison of the ASUS ROG Strix Z690-I with other MINI-ITX main boards. I have built a system with this MINI-ITX MB and am very pleased with the performance.

    It has a custom loop for cooling both the i9 12900K and an AMD RX 6800 GPU.
  • Dr_b_ - Friday, June 17, 2022 - link

    Do people actually want all the bling on the motherboard like the plastic LED features, which imho are really not appealing, and all the metal armor? It doesn't make it go faster, and adds cost. This is a retail value $490 mobo, selling for $600. With Z790 mobos due out in a few months, unless completely desperate and flush with cash, makes no sense to buy it.
  • COtech - Sunday, June 19, 2022 - link

    Hopefully Z790 boards will come with a "downturn mindset" - function not flash. Otherwise I don't see them selling.
  • poohbear - Wednesday, June 22, 2022 - link

    These $600 mobos are $250-$300 in a year's time. Don't pay this early adopter tax.
  • mode_13h - Thursday, June 23, 2022 - link

    I was just looking at ASUS boards, the other day. I've somewhat unexpectedly found myself pondering an upgrade of my workstation to Alder Lake. I visited ASUS' site and found their product filter to be half-broken (when I select ATX form factor, why am I still being shown mini-ITX boards??) and couldn't make very much sense of their different product lines.
  • bwj - Monday, June 27, 2022 - link

    Any mobo with the i7-12700K will hit 5100MHz without any tuning whatsoever, 5200MHz if you remove all the power limits and don't touch anything else. What you get from +$200 for the i9 CPU and +$450 on the mobo is an extra 100MHz? Hardly seems like money well spent.

    The only real argument I can see for this board is it comes with the thunderbolt ports and the 2.5G ethernet, instead of requiring the $130 (and terrible) TB4 add-in card and the $75 i225v add-in card.
  • NickFisherUX - Wednesday, August 10, 2022 - link

    ASUS has always made the best boards.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now