Battlefield 2, v1.22

We've updated our BF2 benchmark (again), which means that old scores have been invalidated. It's really difficult to understand why a game patch necessitates new demo files, and ideally gaming companies will start to make demo file support backwards compatible if at all possible. If there's a good reason for the change, that's acceptable, but DICE has never been forthcoming about what "upgrades" have been made to the demo recoding/playback features.

We've tried to keep the demo file somewhat consistent, so we're still using the Operation Clean Sweep map with 16 players and a variety of camera angles including shots for infantry, planes, helicopters, tanks, etc. Other levels in Battlefield 2 are not quite as demanding on the system, but we wanted a large map with water to present something of a worst-case scenario. (Granted, getting a demo with 64 players would represent a better worst-case scenario, but creating such demos on our own is a bit difficult.) We didn't even bother running tests without 4xAA, as the game is almost entirely CPU limited on the top SLI configurations we're testing.





All of the platforms offer reasonable performance under Battlefield 2. Even the Shuttle system with a single GTX card manages to remain playable, and in fact it gives the 7900 GT SLI configurations a run for the money. Considering a single GTX card starts at $480 while two 7900 GT cards will run $580, not to mention the fact that you don't have to deal with SLI incompatibilities or headaches, and you can make a good point for going with a single fast GPU. That's something we'll keep an eye on throughout the rest of the game benchmarks, but of course the bottom line is that if you want maximum performance, the FragBox SLI system is about equal to the best full-ATX desktop systems.





Enabling audio causes quite a bit more load on the CPU, making Battlefield 2 largely GPUs limited. With dual GTX cards, the FragBox is about 17% slower than the DFI system -- this despite the fact that they both use the same Realtek ALC850 codec. Looking at the 7900 GT numbers, equipping the FragBox with an X-Fi card doesn't really help performance, though again we must say that it definitely sounds better. Something else to pay attention to is how much having only 1GB of RAM hurts performance in this configuration. It didn't seem to have much of an impact with the GTX cards, perhaps because they have 512MB of RAM each, but the 1GB GT SLI configuration is easily outperformed by a single GTX with 2GB of RAM.

We also tracked loading times for Battlefield 2, and though we don't have a graph made up, I can give you a couple quick numbers. The FragBox takes 100 to 140 seconds to load a level with sound when using to GT cards, the X-Fi, and 1GB of RAM. Upgrading to 2GB of RAM cuts the load times down to 50 to 80 seconds. That's the amount of time it takes to start a Battlefield 2 and load a level, but transitions between levels will also be substantially faster with 2GB of RAM.

Introduction to Gaming Benchmarks Doom and Quake
Comments Locked

32 Comments

View All Comments

  • Pirks - Wednesday, May 3, 2006 - link

    Thanks, but that's still very far from what I was asking. If all the PC is made of were just ONE SINGLE ABIT MOBO, then yeah it'd be a close shot :P
  • islandtechengineers - Wednesday, May 3, 2006 - link

    small and powerful; like another has stated; Build my own. being rich and able to let someone else do the work for you = lazy , but i wouldnt mind putting it in my car if i had cash to throw out...
  • Inkjammer - Wednesday, May 3, 2006 - link

    "Performance nerd-vana" may have to be one of the best quotes I've seen in a while. =D
  • Missing Ghost - Wednesday, May 3, 2006 - link

    What's so special about it?
  • unclebud - Wednesday, May 3, 2006 - link

    the review was still interesting, as always
    what i was saying is that another group of journalists reviewed the fragbox before and they encountered a very different type of experience... it's also interesting that they sent a fragbox with an evga board now and not the msi/ati 480~
  • Gary Key - Wednesday, May 3, 2006 - link

    I cannot answer directly for Jarred in this case, but my previous experiences with Falcon Northwest have shown they do listen to their customers and will correct any product issues immediately.
  • unclebud - Wednesday, May 3, 2006 - link

    "I can't really evaluate the support that comes from Falcon at this time."

    imagine that...
  • JarredWalton - Thursday, May 4, 2006 - link

    They put a customer sticker on every system. This one is for "AnandTech" - too bad I have to send it back.
  • daftpunkit - Wednesday, May 3, 2006 - link

    My parents got me a Falcon NW for college, 4 years later it still runs pretty sweet, and 4 years in the computer world means it's ancient.

    The support was outstanding too I would say. They are quick too. I think the original had a MSI mobo but it blew up or something about a year into me owning it and I shipped it to them they replaced it with a nice ASUS mobo and got it back pretty quick.
  • Ryan Norton - Wednesday, May 3, 2006 - link

    Man, I remember when I was 10-14 or so and my dad still picked out the family computer, guaranteeing slowness and poor Doom II performance... he subscribed to Computer Gaming World and the Mach V ads always made me drool! I would never buy a FNW system when I can build my own so much easier, UNLESS I get rich one day... then man, I'm gonna beat a path to their door for whatever octo-SLI quad-CPU 32GB RAM madness reigns in the future.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now