We’re back again for the final phase of our second Build-a-Rig competition. For this round we are doing a theme relevant to many a younger enthusiast: back to school computers. In this Round we invited both Tony Ou from SilverStone and Jeremy Mortensen from Crucial to each spec out an $800 computer for the back to school season.

Earlier we interviewed both representatives to discuss their own background and also to find the motives behind the configurations they submitted. Last week we got to dive into the experience of building these computers, and got to see what it is like to put these machines together and how easy they are to work on for those that like to get their hands dirty.

Now for the final part of this round of Build-a-Rig we have the showdown: running our benchmark suite and seeing how these machines compare to each other. The $800 budget this time is substantially tighter than what we saw in our previous round, which when coupled with both machines being built on mITX platforms for portability brings its own constraints, and as a result we can see completely different trade-offs being made on both sides.

With such differing priorities there can't be one clear winner purely on performance alone. For students this is just as complicated as any other use case since what kind of computer is best will depend entirely on the class load being taken. If either a student just needs a machine to type out homework on and game or has software that leans heavily on the GPU, then SilverStone’s Mighty Milo may make a strong showing. But there are still disciplines out there that either don't use GPU acceleration extensively or where a stronger CPU is needed to back it up. Maybe Crucial's Ballistix Bantam is prepared and ready with its more capable Core i3-4170. Even then, some students either don't game much or focus on games that don't need a crazy computer and would prefer a multitasking monster to run everything at once.

Last but certainly not least of course is the giveaway. At the end of the Build-A-Rig challenge we will be giving these systems away, and that means today is the last day to enter. Two lucky winners within the United States will be receiving these completed systems for their computing pleasure. So if you have yet to enter, you will want to do so before midnight tomorrow, November 13th.

Build-A-Rig Round 2 Entry Form

The Builds So Far

Last week we took a look at the assembled SilverStone and Crucial designs. So before jumping into our benchmarks, let’s quickly recap the systems and their parts.

SilverStone's Mighty Milo

SilverStone’s Mighty Milo aims to be a low profile machine with its narrow case and is potentially a quieter machine with only the fans necessary to keep hot components cooled off. Inside we find a Zotac GeForce GTX 960 and a more affordable Intel Pentium G3258 driving the system. Sitting on top of the overclockable Pentium is a Silverstone ARO6 cooler that will either maintain quiet CPU cooling or provide enough cooling to crank up the clock speed depending on the end user’s preference. The motherboard supports Wireless AC and a 120GB Crucial boot SSD will house Windows and any important software.

SilverStone's Mighty Milo
Component Selection Price as
Processor (CPU) Intel Pentium G3258
(2C/2T, 3.2 GHz)
$69.99 $69.99
Motherboard ASRock H97M-ITX/ac $95.99 $93.20
Graphics Cards (GPU) Zotac GeForce GTX 960 OC $179.99 $179.99
Memory (DRAM) Crucial Ballistix Sport XT 
(2x4GB) DDR3-1600 C9
$39.99 $43.95
Storage (SSD) Crucial BX100 120GB $69.99 $67.75
Storage (HDD) 1TB Western Digital Blue
2.5-in 5400 RPM 8MB Cache 
$60.99 $60.99
Power Supply (PSU) SilverStone ST45SF
450W Bronze SFF
$69.99 $71.33
Chassis SilverStone Milo ML08B-H
(with handle)
$84.99 $84.99
CPU Cooling SilverStone Argon AR06 $39.99 $39.99
Operating System Microsoft Windows 10 Home
64-bit OEM
$99.99 $99.99
Extras None    
Total   $811.90 $812.17

There is one more quick note to be made on the Mighty Milo. As mentioned earlier this machine houses a Pentium G3258. At stock it is a humble dual-core processor, but it has also made quite the splash by being one of the first overclockable budget CPU's to come out of Intel in some time. The ASRock H97M-ITX/ac board that in turn holds the CPU has built-in overclocking profiles for easy performance tuning. In our interview with Tony, he said that he expected the chip to do around 4GHz. To my pleasant surprise not only did the SilverStone AR06 do a good job of keeping up with the chip at 4GHz, but I was also able to hit 4.2GHz at 1.28v via the H97M-ITX/ac’s built-in overclocking profile, and with a little fiddling still I settled on a stable 4.3GHz at 1.3v. This overclock is stable for the entirety of our test suite, but whether or not this machine lives overclocked or stock will be up to its soon to be owner.

Crucial's Ballistic Bantam

Moving on to Crucial's Ballistix Bantam we have a cube shaped Thermaltake case housing an Intel Core i3-4170 and an EVGA GeForce GTX 950. Though this computer doesn't house an overclockable chip with a large cooler it packs better stock performance thanks to AVX and Hyperthreading, along with a larger SSD for housing important data. In addition as we saw in the build logs I found this case easier to build in and tidy up and I would suspect that this machine will continue to be the easier machine to upgrade and customize in the future.

Crucial's Ballistix Bantam
Component Selection Price as
Processor (CPU) Intel Core i3-4170 (2C/4T, 3.7 GHz) $124.99 $124.82
Motherboard GIGABYTE GA-B85N Phoenix-WiFi $84.99 $84.99
Graphics Cards (GPU) EVGA GeForce GTX 950 $159.99 $159.99
Memory (DRAM) Crucial Ballistix Tactical Tracer
2x4GB DDR3-1600 C8
$47.99 $48.92
Storage (SSD) Crucial MX200 mSATA 250GB $94.99 $94.99
Storage (HDD) Seagate Barracuda 1TB 7200RPM $50.99 $49.81
Power Supply (PSU) Thermaltake TR2 600W $54.99 $55.05
Chassis Thermaltake Core V1 Extreme Cube $49.99 $49.99
CPU Cooling None - -
Operating System Microsoft Windows 8.1 64-bit OEM $99.99 $99.99
Extras LG USB 2.0 Portable DVDRW $24.99 $24.99
Total   $793.90 $793.54

With introductions out of the way let's take a look at how these computers perform.

System Performance
Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • nathanddrews - Thursday, November 12, 2015 - link

    But... but...
  • shmuck - Thursday, November 12, 2015 - link

    Damn straight! Somebody's got to do the complaining around here. Harumph.

    The privacy information which was missing from the link:

    This is a lot more encouraging.
  • eanazag - Tuesday, November 17, 2015 - link

    My only gripe about the contest is it is closed too fast. It seems like you have less than 24 hours to enter it. The first one was confusing because Anandtech used to just place a post on the article and you were "entered". I think I have it figured out now. We just need a few more of these for me to enter.

    I understand the marketing hope on having it end so quickly. I typically read all the headlines when they're released and then read the articles later.
  • BrokenCrayons - Thursday, November 12, 2015 - link

    Even after benchmarking, I still find it very difficult to favor one system over the other. They're both very solid builds without any show stopping flaws. Either system would serve a college student well in a variety of computing tasks. As usual, I love reading these build-a-rig articles.
  • Samus - Thursday, November 12, 2015 - link

    Damn that Silverstone is a sexy beast. Throw in i5-4690k in there and damn...
  • racerx_is_alive - Thursday, November 12, 2015 - link

    The only problem with spreading these articles out they way they are is that I'm only 75% sure I signed up for the sweepstakes with the first article, but don't want to do it again and get my entry tossed. But otherwise, I really like the way this series is organized, and the computers they've built.
  • smorebuds - Thursday, November 12, 2015 - link


    Sounds like you'll still have an entry in there.
  • Ryan Smith - Thursday, November 12, 2015 - link

    Humm, interesting. I hadn't considered that angle before. Thanks for the feedback.
  • ShieTar - Thursday, November 12, 2015 - link

    Nice, but am I the only one that feels that more fun should be poked at the 600W-PSU in the 200W-PC?

    Just shows that even when somebody knows what they are doing in general, they will always remain capable of messing up on some important detail.
  • BrokenCrayons - Thursday, November 12, 2015 - link

    The 600 watt PSU is excessive for the computer's current hardware, but it might be worth considering the extra wattage as headroom to grow into a more powerful CPU and/or graphics card later without being concerned about wattage. The Core i3-4170 is a 54 watt TDP processor and the GTX 950 is a 90 watt card. Moving up to a GTX 980 would add 75 watts more demand (165 watts total power according to NV's site) and an i7-4770 would need another 30 watts (84 watt TDP). That'd quickly turn the 200+ watt PC into a 300+ watt one which puts the PSU at 50% load which is well into the more efficient areas of its power delivery curve.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now