System Performance

Power Consumption

Power consumption was tested on the system while in a single MSI GTX 770 Lightning GPU configuration with a wall meter connected to the OCZ 1250W power supply. This power supply is Gold rated, and as I am in the UK on a 230-240 V supply, leads to ~75% efficiency > 50W, and 90%+ efficiency at 250W, suitable for both idle and multi-GPU loading. This method of power reading allows us to compare the power management of the UEFI and the board to supply components with power under load, and includes typical PSU losses due to efficiency. These are the real world values that consumers may expect from a typical system (minus the monitor) using this motherboard.

While this method for power measurement may not be ideal, and you feel these numbers are not representative due to the high wattage power supply being used (we use the same PSU to remain consistent over a series of reviews, and the fact that some boards on our test bed get tested with three or four high powered GPUs), the important point to take away is the relationship between the numbers. These boards are all under the same conditions, and thus the differences between them should be easy to spot.

Power Consumption: Long Idle with GTX 770

Power Consumption: Idle with GTX 770

Power Consumption: OCCT Load with GTX 770

While idle power consumption is not the lowest, peak power consumption under load nudges around the 200W barrier. The power delta between idle and load is 131W, which matches the GIGABYTE X99-UD7 WIFI numbers within a watt.

Windows 7 POST Time

Different motherboards have different POST sequences before an operating system is initialized. A lot of this is dependent on the board itself, and POST boot time is determined by the controllers on board (and the sequence of how those extras are organized). As part of our testing, we look at the POST Boot Time using a stopwatch. This is the time from pressing the ON button on the computer to when Windows 7 starts loading. (We discount Windows loading as it is highly variable given Windows specific features.) 

Windows 7 POST Time - Default

Windows 7 POST Time - Stripped

A default POST time under 20 seconds for an X99 motherboard is quite impressive.

USB Backup

For this benchmark, we transfer a set size of files from the SSD to the USB drive using DiskBench, which monitors the time taken to transfer. The files transferred are a 1.52 GB set of 2867 files across 320 folders – 95% of these files are small typical website files, and the rest (90% of the size) are small 30 second HD videos. In an update to pre-Z87 testing, we also run MaxCPU to load up one of the threads during the test which improves general performance up to 15% by causing all the internal pathways to run at full speed.

USB 2.0 Copy Times

USB 3.0 Copy Times

USB 3.0 seemed a little slow in our testing compared to some other boards.

DPC Latency

Deferred Procedure Call latency is a way in which Windows handles interrupt servicing. In order to wait for a processor to acknowledge the request, the system will queue all interrupt requests by priority. Critical interrupts will be handled as soon as possible, whereas lesser priority requests such as audio will be further down the line. If the audio device requires data, it will have to wait until the request is processed before the buffer is filled.

If the device drivers of higher priority components in a system are poorly implemented, this can cause delays in request scheduling and process time. This can lead to an empty audio buffer and characteristic audible pauses, pops and clicks. The DPC latency checker measures how much time is taken processing DPCs from driver invocation. The lower the value will result in better audio transfer at smaller buffer sizes. Results are measured in microseconds.

DPC Latency

The X99-Gaming G1 WIFI nudged the 100 microsecond barrier which is our ideal aim for X99.

In The Box, Test Setup and Overclocking CPU Performance
Comments Locked

16 Comments

View All Comments

  • Meegul - Thursday, December 18, 2014 - link

    The aesthetic of the motherboard would be nice. That is, if it weren't for those green capacitors by the audio chip. Seriously, with a good looking red and black motherboard, what is such a color doing on it? Otherwise, it looks like a pretty good motherboard, albeit a bit pricey even for an X99 motherboard.
  • chizow - Thursday, December 18, 2014 - link

    They're colored that way because Nichicon makes them that way and has for years. Audiophiles who know the difference will notice this immediately and prefer this over a black or red tinned version.

    https://www.google.com/search?q=nichicon+audio+cap...

    Unfortunately for this board, the Nichicon audio caps aren't enough to save the lackluster sound output, which ends up sounding extremely low bitrate and crushed/dumpy at higher output levels (adjusting input load level does not help).

    If you have a few add-in boards installed, chances you don't see these caps anyways.
  • stux - Thursday, December 18, 2014 - link

    [img]http://www.hardwareheaven.com/reviewimages/gigabyt...[/img]
  • leetruski - Friday, December 19, 2014 - link

    Those look like electrolytic capacitors rather than solid state. Is there a particular reason as to why they would have gone with those? Seem kind of out of place on a premium board.
  • JeffFlanagan - Friday, December 19, 2014 - link

    >Unfortunately for this board, the Nichicon audio caps aren't enough to save
    > the lackluster sound output

    Who's still using onboard sound output? Audiophiles will use the USB DAC-UP ports to attach a nice external DAC, and the rest of us are using HDMI audio. A motherboard is about the worst place possible to encode audio due to all the electrical noise from the rest of the MB.
  • Stuka87 - Thursday, December 18, 2014 - link

    The board looks nice, and has a ton of great features (3 year warranty is nice). Although I really question the built in wifi on a gaming board. Wifi is terrible for gaming. Random latency spikes make online gaming an aggravating experience.
  • Morawka - Thursday, December 18, 2014 - link

    ever heard of wifi direct? you'll need it for xbox one controllers, Nvidia shield controllers, etc..

    there are tons of wifi direct hardware on the market nowadays.
  • imaheadcase - Friday, December 19, 2014 - link

    So? Still does not change the fact wifi is terrible for gaming.
  • chizow - Friday, December 19, 2014 - link

    I think the point is, its not either/or, it can be both. You can always hardwire your ethernet connection and use the wifi direct for connecting peripherals that use it for the best of both worlds...
  • aliquis - Monday, March 5, 2018 - link

    Hi Morawka.
    I just want to know how that WiFi Direct Connection using your Xbox One or Nvidia Shield controller is working for you ...
    Even if it worked with any wireless card which the later doesn't do AFAIK and likely not the former either the Nvidia Shield one also need to have an Nvidia graphics card so it's complete garbage.
    It's disturbing Valve doesn't have Steam controller support built in in their Steam Link =P

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now