Performance - Content Creation

Content Creation Performance
Internet Content Creation SYSMark 2002
Desktop 1.6GHz

Desktop 1.5GHz

Toshiba 1905-S277

Desktop 1.4GHz

Desktop 1.3GHz

176

168

164

156

153

|
0
|
35
|
70
|
106
|
141
|
176
|
211

Like we mentioned before, the notebook system did better in the Internet Content Creation part of SYSMark 2002 than it did in any other part. Here the Satellite 1905-S277 performed almost like the desktop Pentium 4 clocked at 1.5GHz, falling only 2.4% behind it.

Look at BAPCo's whitepaper on the benchmark, we can see that SYSMark 2002 is more I/O intensive than SYSMark 2001. This can explain why the Satellite 1905-S277 performed slower in comparison to the desktop Pentium 4 system than the ASUS T9 did in comparison to the desktop Pentium III system (as the ASUS review used SYSMark 2001).

Content Creation Performance
Content Creation Winstone 2002
Desktop 1.6GHz

Desktop 1.5GHz

Desktop 1.4GHz

Toshiba 1905-S277

Desktop 1.3GHz

ASUS T9 900MHz

22.5

20.7

19.9

18.9

17.8

11.7

|
0
|
5
|
9
|
14
|
18
|
23
|
27

We found in our last notebook review, the ASUS T9 review, that Content Creation Winstone 2002 is extremely I/O intensive and thus is typically problematic for notebook systems. The Toshiba Satellite 1905-S277's performance in this benchmark was actually not so bad, performing between the level of the desktop 1.3GHz system and the 1.4GHz one. The Satellite 1905-S277 performed 19% slower than the desktop 1.6GHz system.

Since we also ran the ASUS T9 notebook through the Content Creation Winstone 2002 tests, we included this notebook in the graph for comparison. As you can see, the Satellite 1905-S277 is clearly faster; in fact it is faster than the ASUS T9 on AC power by 61.5%.



Toshiba Notebook provided by TigerDirect - Click Here to Purchase for just $1799
Performance - Overall Performance Performance - BatteryMark 2001 and Startup Times
Comments Locked

0 Comments

View All Comments

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now