Section by Gavin Bonshor

X570 Motherboards: PCIe 4.0 For Everybody

One of the biggest additions to AMD's AM4 socket is the introduction of the PCIe 4.0 interface. The new generation of X570 motherboards marks the first consumer motherboard chipset to feature PCIe 4.0 natively, which looks to offer users looking for even faster storage, and potentially better bandwidth for next-generation graphics cards over previous iterations of the current GPU architecture. We know that the Zen 2 processors have implemented the new TSMC 7nm manufacturing process with double the L3 cache compared with Zen 1. This new centrally focused IO chiplet is there regardless of the core count and uses the Infinity Fabric interconnect; the AMD X570 chipset uses four PCIe 4.0 lanes to uplink and downlink to the CPU IO die.

Looking at a direct comparison between AMD's AM4 X series chipsets, the X570 chipset adds PCIe 4.0 lanes over the previous X470 and X370's reliance on PCIe 3.0. A big plus point to the new X570 chipset is more support for USB 3.1 Gen2 with AMD allowing motherboard manufacturers to play with 12 flexible PCIe 4.0 lanes and implement features how they wish. This includes 8 x PCIe 4.0 lanes, with two blocks of PCIe 4.0 x4 to play with which vendors can add SATA, PCIe 4.0 x1 slots, and even support for 3 x PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 slots.

AMD X570, X470 and X370 Chipset Comparison
Feature X570 X470 X370
PCIe Interface (to peripherals) 4.0 2.0 2.0
Max PCH PCIe Lanes 24 24 24
USB 3.1 Gen2 8 2 2
Max USB 3.1 (Gen2/Gen1) 8/4 2/6 2/6
DDR4 Support 3200 2933 2667
Max SATA Ports 8 8 8
PCIe GPU Config x16
x8/x8
x8/x8/x8*
x16
x8/x8
x8/x8/x4
x16
x8/x8
x8/x8/x4
Memory Channels (Dual) 2/2 2/2 2/2
Integrated 802.11ac WiFi MAC N N N
Chipset TDP 11W 4.8W 6.8W
Overclocking Support Y Y Y
XFR2/PB2 Support Y Y N

One of the biggest changes in the chipset is within its architecture. The X570 chipset is the first Ryzen chipset to be manufactured and designed in-house by AMD, with some helping ASMedia IP blocks, whereas previously with the X470 and X370 chipsets, ASMedia directly developed and produced it using a 55nm process. While going from X370 at 6.8 W TDP at maximum load, X470 was improved upon in terms of power consumption to a lower TDP of 4.8 W. For X570, this has increased massively to an 11 W TDP which causes most vendors to now require small active cooling of the new chip.

Another major change due to the increased power consumption of the X570 chipset when compared to X470 and X370 is the cooling required. All but one of the launched product stack features an actively cooled chipset heatsink which is needed due to the increased power draw when using PCIe 4.0 due to the more complex implementation requirements over PCIe 3.0. While it is expected AMD will work on improving the TDP on future generations when using PCIe 4.0, it's forced manufacturers to implement more premium and more effective ways of keeping componentry on X570 cooler.

This also stretches to the power delivery, as AMD announced that a 16-core desktop Ryzen 3950X processor is set to launch later on in the year, meaning motherboard manufacturers needed to implement the new power deliveries on the new X570 boards with requirements of the high-end chip in mind, with better heatsinks capable of keeping the 105 W TDP processors efficient.

Memory support has also been improved with a seemingly better IMC on the Ryzen 3000 line-up when compared against the Ryzen 2000 and 1000 series of processors. Some motherboard vendors are advertising speeds of up to DDR4-4400 which until X570, was unheard of. X570 also marks a jump up to DDR4-3200 up from DDR4-2933 on X470, and DDR4-2667 on X370. As we investigated in our Ryzen 7 Memory Scaling piece back in 2017, we found out that the Infinity Fabric Interconnect scales well with frequency, and it is something that we will be analyzing once we get the launch of X570 out of the way, and potentially allow motherboard vendors to work on their infant firmware for AMD's new 7nm silicon.

Memory Hierarchy Changes: Double L3, Faster Memory Benchmarking Setup: Windows 1903
Comments Locked

447 Comments

View All Comments

  • Manabu - Sunday, July 7, 2019 - link

    The text is correct, the chart is wrong. The x470 runs indeed 4.8W peak and 1.9W in an idle mode.

    Please fix it anand people.
  • webmastir - Sunday, July 7, 2019 - link

    Fun fact. You cannot install and/or use Ryzen Master with the Hyper-V role installed. It's not supported, nor does the program run (it's also noted in their Software Installation Guide).
  • julianbautista87 - Sunday, July 7, 2019 - link

    Great product! I'm impressed how technology advances so fast. Might buy one for home next month.
  • eastcoast_pete - Sunday, July 7, 2019 - link

    Thanks! Appreciate the fast turn-around of this first deeper dive into the 3000-series Ryzen. The 3700x looks tempting.
    @Andrei & Gavin & Ian: On another note, I look forward to seeing a review of the Ryzen APUs, especially the 3400G! I am about to build a new $ 500 potato (HTPC), and the 3400G looks promising. However, before I start building, I'd really like to read a reasonably thorough review on the new APUs before committing to the build. If and when you do, please also report on the HTPC usability of the 3200G and 3400G in detail, especially 10bit HDR playback and 4K streaming. Surprisingly (or not), PCs have been lagging behind the mobile SoCs on this.
  • Meteor2 - Monday, July 15, 2019 - link

    Seconded
  • djayjp - Sunday, July 7, 2019 - link

    So the slower CPU of the two with less cache per core is faster in single threaded apps...? Makes sense....
  • GeoffreyA - Sunday, July 7, 2019 - link

    The true return of the Athlon 64. Well done, and keep it up. I knew I'd see this day all those years ago.

    Thank you for this review as well. Take care.
  • hsienhsinlee - Sunday, July 7, 2019 - link

    Are their respective L3 caches shared across the chiplets or private to each CDD?
  • Andrei Frumusanu - Sunday, July 7, 2019 - link

    Private in each CCX, the same as previous Zen designs.
  • djayjp - Sunday, July 7, 2019 - link

    Wow so even the fastest consumer CPU can only manage 7 Megarays/s whereas RTX GPUs can do 7 Gigarays/s for about the same price, or 1000x faster.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now